Rep. Ratcliffe calls for answers on the Obama administration’s “stand-down” order in response to Russian interference in the 2016 election
June 25, 2018
Questions potential political motivation of concurrent Trump campaign investigation
WASHINGTON – Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) called on top national security officials today to provide answers on the Obama administration’s “stand-down” order in response to Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
The issuance of the “stand-down” order was confirmed under oath last week by President Obama’s cybersecurity czar, Michael Daniel, before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
The “stand-down” order occurred almost simultaneously with the launch of the investigation into the possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. This brings the potential political motivation of the Obama administration’s investigation into the Trump campaign into question, Ratcliffe said.
The full text of Ratcliffe’s letter to National Security Advisor John R. Bolton, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen is as follows:
June 25, 2018
John R. Bolton
National Security Advisor
National Security Council
Eisenhower Executive Office Building
1650 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20504
Dear Mr. Bolton,
During a recent Senate Select Committee on Intelligence hearing held to review the Obama and Trump administrations’ policy response to Russian election interference, Michael Daniel, the cybersecurity czar for former President Obama, confirmed to Sen. Jim Risch (R-ID) that former national security advisor Susan Rice issued a “stand down” order in August 2016 in response to Russian cyber-attacks during the 2016 presidential campaign. In nearly simultaneous fashion, the Obama Administration launched an aggressive investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
In that same hearing, former Obama State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said that Russian President Vladimir Putin expected deterrent measures when Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election, but did not see any response, so he felt he could “keep pushing.”
As Chairman of the House Homeland Security Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection Subcommittee, these cyber-threats and the failure of the Obama Administration to take action are particularly alarming. In addition, given ongoing developments shedding light on improper adherence to standard practice and the presence of pervasive bias at the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice during the Obama Administration, the “stand down” order raises further troubling questions about whether Obama Administration officials appropriately carried out their duties to protect the national security of the United States, or rather used their authority to carry out politically-motivated objectives.
In order to further assess whether appropriate steps were taken to protect the United States from cyber-attacks, please examine and respond to the following, either in writing or a classified briefing if deemed appropriate:
1. Did Susan Rice issue the stand-down order on her own volition, or at the behest of other Obama Administration officials?
2. What justification, if any, did Susan Rice use to support issuance of the stand-down order?
3. Did Susan Rice depart from traditional practice and procedure of the National Security Council in issuing the stand-down order?
We owe it to the American people to ensure that the federal government follows its own rules, without regard to partisan bias and motivations. I appreciate your consideration of these important questions.
Member of Congress
cc: The Honorable Mike Pompeo
Secretary of State
United States Department of State
The Honorable Kirstjen Nielsen
Secretary of Homeland Security
United States Department of Homeland Security
Ratcliffe recently discussed this concern in an interview with Maria Bartiromo on Fox News. Click here to watch.